Tamrurim תַּמְרוּרִ֔ים

  • Naqba

    Today is the commemoration of what the Palestinian community calls Naqba.

    I have written many times how I feel the UN and UK have great responsibility in the events that unfolded and yet Israel is solely blamed.

    I also feel one failure of Jewish education is not teaching this event in any way. Ignoring it completely. But that is ignorant because we cannot ignore the inherited trauma of those who descend from the people whose lives were destroyed in the events of Naqba. And those people are our neighbors, our citizens, our potential partners in peace.

    Years ago, Rabbi Evan Traylor made reference to the two poems on his post of this day.

    What stands out to me most:

    In Darwish’s second stanza, he says not to forget those who seek peace when you are in the midst of war. I deeply urge people to follow the work of Roots/Shorashim/Judur, Tag Meir and Standing Together. These are the groups who have been in the work of pursuing peace for years.

    In Al-Qasim’s poem the message of “my country” acknowledges the historical, religious, and emotional ties for many peoples to haEretz. Why is this so hard for so many?

  • Rafah Invasion

    When anti-terrorism Muslim scholars (who are Palestinian rights activists) “get it” more than some Jewish leaders (who align supremely far left)….

    I can’t wrap my head around how some of my colleagues are fully blaming Israel for the tragedies within Gaza instead of holding Hamas accountable.

    I don’t deny that there is terrible suffering in Gaza and that entering Rafah will be a terrible. bloodbath.

    I don’t deny that Israel needed to handle civilians differently knowing Hamas uses them as human shields (I had some ideas, and I may write about this in the future, but not sure “hindsight is 20/20” is helpful right now.)

    I don’t deny that there are some wayward IDF soldiers and their COs doing unspeakable things.

    AND, I hold Hamas responsible that the IDF is there and that there is terrible suffering. And that they could have ended this (even not started this) at any point by surrendering hostages and either turning themselves in or negotiating an exit to somewhere else (if anyone would take them).

    My tent of pluralistic thought is pretty wide, but folks who don’t “get it” the way anti terrorism scholars do, I feel may need to ask themselves what they may be missing or why their beliefs may have shaped the way they have and could their thinking be flawed?

    Link to Eid’s article in Newsweek.

  • Personal Statement on Israel/Palestine